Skip to content

Conversation

@dimav78
Copy link
Contributor

@dimav78 dimav78 commented Oct 16, 2025

In many areas, documentation retained MSP-focused language. Now that we sell to end users, is looks confusing, so these references were updated.

@dimav78 dimav78 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2025 19:20
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Pull Request Review: 1Secure MSP Terminology Cleanup

Summary

This PR successfully updates MSP-focused terminology to be more inclusive of direct end-user sales. The changes are well-executed and consistent across all 11 files. The approach is appropriate and maintains clarity while broadening the target audience.

✅ Strengths

1. Consistent Terminology Updates

  • Excellent use of the pattern "managing organization (e.g., Managed Service Provider)" to clarify meaning while maintaining backward compatibility
  • The "MSP" column header → "Administrator" change in role definition tables is clearer and more accurate (docs/1secure/admin/organizations/addingusers/roledefinitions.md:13-135)

2. Appropriate Scope

  • Changes are surgical and focused on terminology only
  • No functional changes or documentation restructuring
  • All 47 additions balanced with 47 deletions shows clean substitution

3. Good Context Preservation

  • Parenthetical explanations like "(e.g., Managed Service Provider)" maintain continuity for existing MSP customers
  • Changes don't eliminate MSP concept, just broaden it appropriately

🔍 Issues Found

1. Inconsistent Terminology Usage (Minor)

The PR uses two different approaches:

  • Approach A: "managing organization (e.g., Managed Service Provider)" - used in most files
  • Approach B: "managing organizations (e.g., Managed Service Providers)" - plural form

Locations:

  • docs/1secure/admin/organizations/overview.md:16 uses singular "Managed Service Providers" after plural "organizations"
  • docs/1secure/admin/riskprofiles/riskassessmentdashboard.md:9 uses plural "Managed Service Providers"

Recommendation: Standardize to always use the singular form in the parenthetical: "(e.g., Managed Service Provider)" for consistency, even when "organizations" is plural.

2. Incomplete Header Update (Minor)

In docs/1secure/admin/organizations/addingusers/addingusers.md:29, the phrase "the organization shall assign" could be clearer as "the managing organization shall assign" to match the section header context.

3. Table Header Alignment Consistency

In roledefinitions.md, the "MSP" column was changed to "Administrator" across all tables. This is correct and improves clarity, but ensure this aligns with actual user role names in the application UI.

📝 Suggestions for Enhancement

1. Documentation Glossary

Consider adding a glossary entry at the beginning of the admin section defining:

  • Managing Organization: An organization that manages multiple child organizations
  • Managed Organization: A child organization managed by a parent/managing organization

2. Consistency in Parent/Child Terminology

The PR uses both "managing/managed organization" and "parent/child organization" interchangeably. Consider standardizing to one pair throughout.

🔒 Security Considerations

✅ No security concerns - documentation-only changes

⚡ Performance Considerations

✅ N/A - documentation-only changes

🧪 Test Coverage

✅ N/A - documentation-only changes

📊 Code Quality Rating

8.5/10 - Excellent execution with minor consistency improvements needed

✨ Recommendations

Must Fix (before merge):

None - the PR is mergeable as-is

Should Fix (recommended):

  1. Standardize the parenthetical terminology to always use singular "Managed Service Provider"
  2. Verify "Administrator" role name matches actual application UI

Nice to Have (future enhancement):

  1. Add a glossary section for terminology
  2. Consider a follow-up PR to fully standardize parent/managing organization terminology

🎯 Conclusion

This is a well-executed documentation update that successfully modernizes the language to reflect the broader customer base. The changes are appropriate, consistent, and maintain backward compatibility through clarifying parentheticals.

Approval Status:Approved with minor suggestions


Review generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants